Survey 09 · The field desk
Contact Medicinal GHK-Cu
For corrections, source suggestions, and editorial questions about the copper-peptide literature surveyed here.
Reach the field desk
Contact Medicinal GHK-Cu using the form below. This is an editorial desk for one purpose: keeping the survey of the GHK-Cu copper-peptide literature accurate. We welcome corrections, citations we may have missed, and questions about how a particular study was characterized.
What this desk cannot do is offer medical advice, recommend a dose, evaluate a product, or answer questions about purchasing the compound. We are not a clinic and not a vendor — there are no clinicians or pharmacists here, and nothing is for sale. Questions of that kind are outside what an editorial project can responsibly answer, and we will not answer them.
If you are flagging a factual error, a note about which page and which citation it concerns helps us verify and fix it quickly against the source.
What to include
A useful correction note names the page, quotes the sentence in question, and points to the source that supports the fix — ideally a PubMed or PMC link. Because every quantitative claim on this site is meant to trace to a published study, the fastest corrections are the ones that arrive with a citation attached. We read every message, prioritize factual corrections, and update the relevant page and its reference entry when a correction checks out against the literature.
We are equally glad to hear about studies we have not yet folded in. The GHK-Cu literature is active — new delivery-system papers, recent-research reviews and animal studies appear regularly — and a field guide is only as current as its last revision. If you know of a peer-reviewed result that sharpens the picture or marks a boundary more precisely, send it along with the reference and we will weigh it the same way we weighed everything already on the shelf.